These Groups Are Trying to Make Investing More Sustainable, and It’s Not Going to Be Easy
A growing number of investors want to put their money behind enterprises that have measurable, positive impact on the environment, workers, women’s rights, and other issues. The problem? There is no standard way to measure and report the impact of an enterprise.
It isn’t for lack of trying. For the last several years, new investor-led groups like the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) and Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) have been developing proprietary reporting frameworks for companies to adopt. SASB and TCFD have earned the endorsement of BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, who urged clients earlier this year to embrace sustainability in their portfolios.
Such an endorsement is a step in the right direction, though there are still hundreds of groups jockeying to make their frameworks the global standard.
“When you have too many competing frameworks, it’s difficult to understand the impact of your investments because you can’t use them to compare portfolios or companies,” said Ronny Beck, Hinduja Bank’s Head of Investment. “The data you report is just numbers on a page if there’s no standard to measure against.”
There seems to be some movement in the right direction, including through the Impact Management Project. A global forum to build consensus on how to measure, compare and report impacts on environmental and social issues, the IMP counts more than 2,000 organizations, and their varying tools and definitions, as participants, including the United Nations, the OECD, and the World Benchmarking Alliance.
Five years into its work, the participants have agreed that the following questions are what shape impact:
- What outcomes the enterprise is contributing to and how important the outcomes are to stakeholders
- Which stakeholders are experiencing the outcome, and how underserved they were prior to the enterprise’s effect
- How many stakeholders experienced the outcome, what degree of change they experienced, and how long they experienced the outcome for
- Whether an enterprise’s and/or investor’s efforts resulted in outcomes that were likely better than what would have occurred otherwise
- The likelihood that impact will be different than expected
What will it take to attach standards to each of these questions? The answer is likely to be a combination of existing efforts, regulation, and consumer and investor expectations. Just as norms for traditional financial reporting evolved over time, the norms for understanding impact have their own path to take.
Why Urban Farming Does Not Need an IPO to Grow — Yet
Innovation in food production is vital, as experts predict needing 50% increase to feed the world’s population by 2050. Food and agriculture startups raised $20 billion in 2019, a 250% increase over the last five years — and that was before COVID-19 increased demand for locally sourced food, especially in cities, and reduced the number of workers available to harvest farm crops.VIEW ARTICLE
Pandemic-Fueled Digitization Creates New Cybersecurity Risks—and an Opportunity for Infosec Firms
The cybersecurity industry is experiencing record growth thanks to the host of needs and concerns raised by the sudden work-from-home transition during the coronavirus lockdowns and quarantines; 40% of companies named IT security as their top post-COVID priority. Before the pandemic, the market was already worth over $115 billion; now, it is projected to nearly double by 2021.VIEW ARTICLE
The Next Generation of Investors Sees Wealth Differently
The next generation of investors are not just building or inheriting wealth. They’re rethinking old standards that prioritize the bottom line over society and sustainability, and they’re pushing the global investment community to join them. Financial institutions can either add to the momentum or be left behind.VIEW ARTICLE